My, my:
Good for him! If that is where his research leads him by all means
he should reverse his position. I have no beef with that and I am
looking forward to going over his work if I can get a copy when it
finally reaches publication. and that is the funny part; we've
got all of this hype going on with the research being touted and then
the repentant global warming skeptic returning to the fold leading up
to the crescendo of the release of the report itself via publication,
probably in one of the more prominent journals. I did notice
one little gem buried on down in the article which many probably
missed. ""Global
warming is real. Perhaps our results
will help cool this portion of the climate debate."
Well, I don't recalling writing that global warming isn't real.
Added to that I don't recall many of the prominent folks in the
skeptic community saying so either. Global warming is
real, all we have to do is look around us to see it. History
records ice floes and freezing over of the Hudson River. We
don't see that anymore. A passage through the Arctic Ocean, the
famed Northwest Passage, has opened up for the first time in my
life. Temperature and weather conditions have been warmer, with
the exception of the last ten years, than earlier in my fifty-five
years of life. I'm not idiotic enough to deny that and I
certainly haven't met another skeptic who is. Well, Richard
Mueller, by his own admission, was. So I guess I stand
corrected.
No, where we skeptics are coming from is that we question both the
extent and proposed cause of the warming. So far I don't see
anything in those sensational press releases and stories to make me
change my mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment